Calling Out ‘Bretenders’
Brett’s good name has been tarnished by a few recent launches and even some established ones. Shady behavior and lack of transparency prevent them from being fully embraced by the community.
Here are a few examples of some Bretts that were not built honestly or intended to be fully owned by the community
Unfair Brett "0x53"
on Base
A Brett with insider whitelist addresses holding a massive 81% supply? This is crazy! On top of that, the LP wasn’t burned, but locked, meaning at some point that liquidity can be pulled from the community without notice.
Frens don’t lie to frens.
Build Brett Back!
Shady Brett "0x66..b4"
on ETH
You think 1% tax is bad? This shady one sneaked a 23% initial buy tax into their contract. It also has a whitelist and hidden owner address. That’s some mega shady behavior and does not benefit the community.
Frens don’t cheat frens.
Build Back Bretter!
OG Brett "0x80"
on ETH
The term OG doesn’t necessarily mean honest or legit. You think 1% is bad? This “Original Grifter” had a 15% initial buy tax and a 70% initial sell tax into their contract. Not the kind of behavior to expect from a community driven Brett.
It’s time to hold all accountable.
Build Brett Better!
It’s Bretter With Frens
The Boys Club are now all together, as they always should have been. As the old saying goes: “Friends who play together, stay together”